-
Turning in assignments:
o When
you turn in the final draft of a paper in this class, please turn in previous
copies with comments as well
-
Syllabus changes: Virtual worlds, social media
portion will stay intact (tweaks are still possible)
-
Keeping session on radiation sickness and
Chernobyl
-
For next week – Continue to read what is on the
syllabus. Rather than read the entire
book, read ch1, 2 from Petryna.
-
Medical tourism/global organ trafficking and
experimental stem cell studies in China will be a part of the new syllabus
-
More changes upcoming to syllabus – Dr. Song
will send it out
From last week: Ways
that Race is being Changed via Genetic Research
-
Big business tied up in commercialization of
personal genetics. We concluded that we
as consumers should be skeptical of these companies
-
Native American genetic testing: DNA testing changing the ways that tribes
define themselves.
-
What are the dangers of equating genetic markers
with cultural/historical groups?
o There
are a lot of pitfalls along this argument
o As
this research becomes more commercialized and widespread, we must be more and
more careful
DNA Fingerprinting in
Forensics:
-
Alec Jefferies: developed method to identify
individuals based on their DNA
-
RFLP Analysis (Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms)
o Measures
length of DNA fragments called VNTRs (variable number tandem repeats) derived
by using restriction enzymes to digest DNA
o These
are highly specific sequences. If they
compare more and more sequences it reduces the likelihood of the DNA matching
by chance
o Technology
used to solve the Pitchfork Double Rape-Murder investigation in the 80s
-
OJ Simpson Trial: first widely publicized use of
DNA evidence.
o Because
of doubts about the validity of the results obtained via DNA evidence, among
other things, he was eventually acquitted.
Session 5:
Technologies of Repair
Sarah Wagner – To Know Where He Lies
- DNA analysis used to identify bodies that were exhumed
(in pieces or otherwise)
- DNA profile match only begins the process of
matching. Short Tandem Repeat (STR)
Analysis is the technique of choice. Use
PCR to amplify small pieces of DNA that are extracted.
- more sites that have the same number of repeats – higher
the chance that the sample matches
à
trying to match victims with families.
-
Wagner originally researched whether Bosnians
are returning to their homes after the war.
Found out that families of most people had been killed, and they were
interested in finding answer about what happened to their loved ones.
Historical
Background:
-
Formerly Yugoslavia. Federation of 6 republics bringing together
groups under Communist regime. President
Tito kept the tension down but when he died in 1990, these groups tried to
establish their own identity.
-
à
outright armed conflict when two of these states declare their own independence
-
Conflict between Bosnians (Muslims), Bosnian
Serbs (Christian), Bosnian Croats, in close proximity.
-
The Serbian army targeted the Bosniacs (Muslims)
and destroyed the capital city, put many of them into concentration camps,
genocide, violence.
-
Violence ended in December 1995 – Dayton
Peace Agreement.
-
St. Louis chosen by the US state department as a
place to resettle some of the Bosnian refugees.
Over 50,000 in St. Louis
-
There is still tension in the country between
the Serbs and Bosnians
Secondary Graves: An “innovation” – Called this by
Wagner
-
very deliberately done by the Serbs to further
dehumanize their victims
-
Wagner comparing the practice to the Nazis for
effect, contrasting with the technology being used to identify the scattered
remains of victims.
-
Body parts all mixed up and scattered, same done
with possessions as well.
ICMP (international
commission on missing persons) Blood Collection – Trying to create a large
enough database to make DNA identification possible via matching
-
ideal match: Very hard to tell if someone is
part of a family. To do so convincingly,
they need blood samples from many family members
Discussion:
- Why keep looking for their families’ remains?
- Why keep looking for their families’ remains?
-
psychological benefits to closure: Knowing what happened to a lost family member
-
having that knowledge is important as well.
-
Having an open question in your life about the
death of a loved one is extremely difficult.
-
Talked about how, from a public model, once an
idea takes hold, it is hard to halt public discourse and opinion. There was a public outcry about the missing
members so the government sought assistance from other sources to help
out.
o Public
was not giving the government the option to ignore this crisis. Other governments have tried to push
something like this under the rug.
-
Religious importance: finding remains and
something to bury. There must be some
kind of ceremony and ritual. Having the
full body of the victim is important to some religious groups, this may be the
case here
-
Maybe there is an element of race here. Cosovo(?) was saved from invasion by the
Serbs by a US bombing campaign, this likely prevented a similar level of
destruction that happened to the Bosnians
o Clinton
now has almost hero status there, statue erected and memorialized.
-
Bringing identity back to a mass of victims is a
way to reclaim individual identity
Comments on the
Ethnography:
- Use of statistics as a form of knowledge – way that it is used to establish the credibility and believability of science
- Use of statistics as a form of knowledge – way that it is used to establish the credibility and believability of science
-
gives the results this ‘aura’ of credibility?
-
How to convince the family that these are the
remains of their loved ones?
-
Different forms of knowledge brought up
-
Extrasensory memories of family members
-
The contrast between casual nature of the
anthropologists vs her fear and her reaction to the grave sites
o Example:
anthropologist almost falls face-first into the gravesite but brushes it off
casually. Author’s reaction to something
like that happening would have been much more severe
-
Having the visualization of these scenes when
reading the book is very useful.
-
Organization felt the necessity to explain
necessity of DNA testing to verify, differing from the websites that we looked
at last week. Explaining the results and
trying to translate them using a cultural and experiential methodology is
extremely important to establishing differing forms of knowledge
-
Passage describing process of how scientists go
through sequences. Requires scientist
and technician to look at the dataset, not automated at all. Technicians perform “genetic detection
work”.
-
Describes this passage, identities must be
described by numbers before they can be translated back into actual people/real
identities.
-
Contrast between types of knowledge: going to
fortune tellers/witch doctors versus getting DNA testing. Even the director was someone who “paid their
3 marks” when trying to figure out what had happened to a loved one. Possibility that going to a witch doctor
added closure to the families before empirical testing was even possible
-
“To be absent is to be missing in time and
space”.
-
Does the government have responsibility to these
people? Opinion seems to think so, and
there is a push for the DNA project
-
presence of US-funded organization in the
country may bring back memories of the event?
-
Guilt in the European context in failing to save
a lot of the Bosnians that were murdered by the Serbs
-
Psychological aspects of this effort: Example – trying to figure out which of the
two sons the remains belonged to.
-
They brought in the mother, and she denied that
the remains were either of her sons
-
Fixation on the physical body:
o People
need remains of family members
o Muslims
(bosniacs) have a great reverence for the dead, so finding the remains is
especially important
-
Focus on the body also comes from medical
traditions. Religious tradition also
shaping their acceptance of this
-
What role do we give DNA, is it useful,
detrimental, etc?
o What
are the unintended consequences of DNA technology?
-
More broadly, what are the unintended
consequences of advancement in technology?
No comments:
Post a Comment