“Becoming a Weapons Scientist” delved into the psyches and
motivations of why the scientists chose to work in a nuclear weapons facility.
As a psychology and anthropology double major, I found this article very
interesting in how it dealt with the individual and how the individual came to
understand his or her place inside the lab. The article focused mostly on
Sylvia and how her family connection to the nuclear bombing in Hiroshima motivated
her to get into the work of nuclear weapons. She shares that she wanted to work
in a nuclear weapons lab, because “‘…I had a fear of big weapons. I really
wanted to see what was happening for myself. I wanted to see what was going on,
rather than take other people’s word”’ (Gusterson, 15).
Throughout
the article, the readers come to see that the scientists are proud of their
work and do not feel conflicted about the ethical or moral debates that one
might assume them to have because of their job. Gusterson came to realize that
he had simply been projecting his own feelings onto these scientists. Through
his own self-reflection, he reminds the readers that it is important to not let
one’s own stereotypes and projections affect how we view a member of a
different culture, be it a laboratory culture, religious culture, or otherwise.
I think
readers also learned a lot about Gusterson throughout this article, which was
interesting because I do not think I have ever learned this much about the
anthropologist himself. He shared with the readers a lot of self-reflections
and his own experiences with nuclear weapons. I would not classify him as
either a silent participant nor an active participant; he was somewhere in the
middle where he was not necessarily partaking in the work of the lab, but he
very much had his own role in the lab and helped expose the scientists to the
anti-nuclear weapon position.
No comments:
Post a Comment