In a previous class, we talked about western and non-western
medicine. One of this weeks’ reading (by Erikson) also discusses how the belief
of “seeing is knowing” gradually became popular as western anatomy and medical
technology was advancing, on which the use of obstetric ultrasound technology
depends largely. Both of these
motivate me to share my thoughts on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). I have
never studied TCM seriously, but I have extensive experience being the patient
of doctors practicing TCM and have learned a little bit about TCM theory here
and there.
Compared to modern
western medical science, TCM science relies much less on “seeing” the inside of
the body – anatomy and imaging, although according to TCM one can sometimes
tell your health situation based on the appearance your skin or your tongue. In
my opinion, this tendency is partly due to the lack of relevant technology for
surgery and imaging traditionally and also partly due to the belief or feeling
that the human body as a whole is an integral and self-organizing system and
therefore should not be violated by intrusion into the body. This
belief/feeling can probably account for the lack of development in surgery
techniques in TCM. In addition, as some of us mentioned in a previous class, non-western medical
sciences are sometimes not based on reductionism, on which western science is
based. I think TCM is also a good example for this.
In addition, Gammeltoft mentioned the skepticism of pregnant women
in Vietnam towards the trustworthiness and safety of obstetric ultrasound
imaging. I am not familiar with traditional Vietnamese medicine, but based on Wikipedia
it is influenced by TCM… So I think maybe this skepticism can be also attributed
to the uncomfortableness towards “seeing the inside of the body” within the local
medical culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment