Birth marks the start of the life cycle. It is
a seemingly natural and inevitable part of life, yet the process and meaning
behind it manifests itself differently in various cultures and have also
changed with the recent development of biomedical technologies, including the
ultrasound. This life event is thus co-constructed by biomedicine but also by the
different beliefs and values that each society holds in that particular time in
history.
Since
the development of ultrasounds, prenatal scans have become a routine part of
most pregnancies around the world. The use of ultrasounds have become so
natural that it is almost unheard of to not use an ultrasound during a
pregnancy (within countries that have access to these scientific advances). However,
even the seemingly simple ultrasound scans hold different significance for
different groups of people. The articles for this week focused on the ultrasound
technology—its normalization and proliferation, uses for pregnancies and fetal
screenings, and differing views on the ultrasound in several cultures. I personally
found Tine Gammeltoft’s “Sonography and Sociality” incredibly interesting so I
will focus on that in this reading response.
Whereas
in the West parents-to-be have considerable faith in medical technology and view
ultrasounds as an early way to meet their future baby, Vietnamese women have a very
paradoxical relationship. In her article, Gammeltoft explores the general
distrust harbored by Vietnamese women for this Western technology in fear that
the scans may hurt the fetus yet their incredibly high consumption rate of
these same scans. Despite their hesitations about the safety of ultrasounds,
urban Vietnamese women pay to have numerous ultrasound scans to see if the
fetus is developing normally without any fetal abnormalities—a real anxiety for
pregnant women in a country where “quality” children are idealized. Even when
the scans come back normal, the women get restless, fearing that although their
baby was normal at the moment of the scan, there is no guarantee of its
normality now. This aligns well with the traditional medicine view that the
body is not materially stable; it is susceptible to change from the slightest
of forces. Also, it is a common perception among Asian countries that the fetus
is an ambiguous being that is neither inanimate nor human and is always
changing. Therefore, the scans provide only momentary reassurance, fueling the need
for even more ultrasound scans. Thus, the underlying cultural conceptions about
the body and the fetus and societal pressures to have a normal, quality baby
bring the Vietnamese women to incessantly subject themselves to ultrasound
scans.
Birth not only represents a biological reproduction but also a
reproduction of the continuity of social values, culture, and beliefs. It is no
surprise then that this biological yet culturally significant event cannot be
analyzed without the context of culture. By analyzing how this life event is
carried out in each society throughout history, we come to an understanding
that birth is not a universal concept and must be evaluated in the context of
both technology and culture.
No comments:
Post a Comment