A theme that continues in this
week’s readings and blog posts, is the influence sociality has on science. Our
first in class reading, as well as several of the following dealt with the
innate challenge scientists face – the unavoidable integration of their own
socialization into their science. Whether it be as simple as subconsciously
applying their own biases to their hypotheses or as subtle as them choosing to
present their data to others in a certain way, because human scientists
practice science, it can never be completely technological.
Interestingly, this week, this
theme is approached from a different angle; instead of looking as social
aspects of life as a hindrance to science, a few of the articles describe
situations in which these social aspects are a lens throough which to analyze
science. As Robert points out in his summary of The Molecularization of Race, there have been attempts to even
integrate social concepts such as race into science, by examining genetic
differences between individuals of different racial backgrounds. However, while
the article describes experiments, which may lay the groundwork for such
studies, it does fail to find any thoroughly conclusive evidence for certain
SNP repetitions within a certain race.
I agree with Robert, that at least until or if there is true evidence
that correlates genetic patterns with certain races, race is not the best way
to categorize the data collected.
The Anthropology of Microbes article also uses a social lens to look at
scientific diversity by conceptualizing the interaction of biology and
environment (physical and social) in the discussion of microbiomes. The “microbial
communities” that influence a person’s biology are dependant on factors such as
food and medical practice, but these factors in turn, are dependent on social
and cultural practice (p. 1). This article consciously looks at “how gender and
its corresponding cultural, economic, and familial roles impact the microbiome.”
For example, antibiotic resistance, which is discussed in the article, arises
often due to individuals failing to complete a round of antibiotics; a habit,
which comes about due to our culturally constructed idea that sickness, is only
present when symptoms are. Thus, through the analysis of these microbiomes, the
influence of sociality on technology, or science, is taken into account. This
sharply contrasts the ideas we came across in earlier readings of trying to isolate
the two as much as possible!
No comments:
Post a Comment