Before reading the
article “The Science and Business of Genetic Ancestry Testing,” I did not know
how wildly inaccurate the tests could be. The many authors of this piece unanimously
urge people to exercise caution when purchasing these types of tests because of
three reasons: (1) they “can have a profound impact on individuals and
communities,” (2) “the assumptions and limitations of these tests make them
less informative than many realize,” and (3) “commercialization has led to
misleading practices that reinforce misconceptions” (399). It is unfortunate
that the business of genetic ancestry testing is not one that is dedicated to
being thorough with its research. The companies seem to have settled with abiding
by the easiest procedure as opposed to the best one. However, with their
business model apparently working well, they have no pressure to change their
testing methods. Instead of educating the public, these businesses are leading
people to value erroneous information about a very important matter.
Moreover, I am not
sure that most people are reading these types of articles about the dangers of genetic
ancestry testing. Many of those who pay for genetic ancestry tests mistakenly
think that they are in fact true. A drastic alteration in this environment can
only come with a fundamental change in the business. If those organizations with
better information can enter the genetic ancestry testing game, then there is a
possibility that the whole business of testing can start to turn in the right
direction. Therefore, I am in full support of the authors’ statement at the end
of the article that: “[W]e encourage ASHG and other professional genetic and
anthropological associations to develop policy statements regarding genetic
ancestry testing” (400). Since it is unlikely that people will stop signing up
for genetic ancestry testing, anthropologists should support more accurate
testing.
No comments:
Post a Comment