Readings from this week (and Eamon’s post on social
epistemology) has me reflecting on the function of the laboratory in terms of
addressing social agendas.
In Knorr-Cetina’s book chapter on “What is a Laboratory?”
the laboratory is described as a theater in which aspects of the social order
are staged, reconfigured and interpreted.
The laboratory, in the scope of this paper, is identified in numerous fields,
for example, medicine, high energy physics, social sciences and even Freudian
psychoanalysis. Across the various
fields, this environment functions as a means through which we ask the
questions deemed most relevant to us socially (or in the science of the times),
and also refined on aggregating data in the active inquiry process. The answers we get are entirely shaped
by the questions we ask, which is subject to culture in the most dynamic sense
of the word. Fullwiley’s article
on the Racialization of DNA provides an example of this process, describing some of the efforts
of trying to identify socially defined concepts of race and ethnicity in DNA
chains. Despite complexity and
instances of greater variation than sameness in terms of, for example,
Caucasian or African American markers, these conceptual categories are still
pursued because our cultural schema deems these categories relevant. (Rather
than what Fullwiley calls “appropriate
definitions of human difference for genetic research.”p25)
In the same spirit, when discussing the epistemological
question about neophytes or the uninitiated setting agendas in science, I agree
with Eamon, that much of what we pursue in science is absolutely guided by
these sorts of people. I also think
that initiated scientists (still drinking coffee, putting trash to the sidewalk
and burning fossil fuels like the politicians) might likewise set very socially
determined agendas, just with perhaps a better understanding of the
applicability of a scientific process in answering the questions. Is there such a thing as a true science
divorced of its temporal social priority setting?
No comments:
Post a Comment